American Airlines e-mails Apology Letter
Just got this in my e-mail:
|
||||
Attached:
American Airlines MD-80 Fleet Inspections
Background: : In 2004, American Airlines was the lead
airline working with Boeing to develop a Service Bulletin to correct
wiring exposure and chafing in the MD-80 auxiliary hydraulic pump wire
bundle. The concern was that exposure and chafing could cause fire in
the wheel well. An Airworthiness Directive (AD) was issued in September
2006, giving MD-80 operators, including American, 18 months to address
this issue. American completed the Service Bulletin in November 2006,
followed by adjustments deemed necessary by American's structural
engineers to comply with the AD well ahead of a March 2008 deadline.
In recent weeks the Federal Aviation Administration significantly
increased its emphasis on monitoring the adherence to Airworthiness
Directives that apply to various U.S. airlines. With respect to
American Airlines' MD-80 fleet, we had a detailed issue that we
believed had to be addressed immediately to remain compliant with the
FAA; if found in non-compliance, we would have been instructed to stop
flying our airplanes.
What is the specific nature of the issue?
The issue
surrounds questions raised by the FAA about the way American
implemented the Engineering Change Order (ECO) addressing the MD-80
auxiliary pump wiring Airworthiness Directive (AD). American fixed the
item well within the specified AD timeframe. The work being done now
centers on a need to change the way in which American complied with the
AD regarding such items as the spacing of the ties on the wiring
bundles and the direction of the retention clips and lacing cords. We
are highly confident that this is not a safety of flight issue because
the wire bundle is secure. It is a matter of how the work was done, not
whether aircraft were protected from the threat of wire exposure and
chafing that could cause fire.
Why ground the entire MD-80 fleet?
It became clear based on the number of questions the FAA raised that
there would be a high percentage of aircraft that would not be found to
be in full compliance of the Airworthiness Directive. Working with the
FAA we were unable to find an alternative solution to regaining
compliance – for example, a multi-day period to rectify the issues – so
we had no choice but to ground the aircraft. While it has been a major
disruption to AA's operation, everyone recognizes the need to ensure
that the MD-80 fleet is in complete compliance and is working to
restore the MD-80s back to service as quickly as possible.
Who is completing the work and why is it taking longer than the previous MD-80 inspections?
There are three levels of American employees accomplishing the work.
American has assigned a team of employees – aviation maintenance
technicians, quality assurance inspectors, and engineers – to inspect
the aircraft and ensure full technical compliance, as well as to make
any additional adjustments. As our aircraft return to service, the FAA
is inspecting those aircraft to ensure compliance.
What is the airline doing for customers?
We are doing everything possible to take care of our customers as
expeditiously as possible while facing the fact that our resources have
been stretched to their limits. We are extremely sorry for the
inconvenience and know that this kind of interruption of travel plans
is unacceptable. While customers are dislocated we are providing meals,
hotels and ground transportation; for those stranded overnight, we will
offer vouchers for future travel on American Airlines. Customers who
were inconvenienced with overnight stays can go to AA.com where a link will guide them to instructions on how to receive compensation.
What is the company doing to make sure it doesn't happen again?
American plans to contract with an independent third party to review
American's compliance processes. This work will help ensure that all
procedures strictly adhere to the technical elements of every directive
so American can avoid this type of schedule disruption in the future.





Comments